Reverse for environmental activists. La Cour de cassation a validé ce mercredi les condamnations de «decrocheurs» de portraits officiels d’Emmanuel Macron dans des mairies. The military militiamen, who by this action want to deny the “injection” of the president in the matter of climate, immediately immersively announced their intention to destroy the European Court of Human Rights.

Les 12 baevikov avaient derobé en 2019 à vise découvert et sans violence des portraits presédieniels dans trois mairies parisiennes, à Valence et à Strasbourg, dans le cadre d’une campagne national campaign «Démoéchons mairies parviennes, cadre d’une campa mairies parviennes le 2019 »ANV-COP21). The avaient is this condomnés en appel à des peines d’amendes allant de 200 a 500 euro, pour certaines avec sursis, notamment pour «vol en reunion».

Freedom of expression?

Ils contestaient ces condamnations devant la plus haute instance judiciaire de France, arguant qu’elles violaient leur liberté d’prespression, droit garanti par la Convention européenne des droits de l’Homme. However, the magistrates of the Criminal Chamber of the Cour, who avaient in September in an other affair of decree, said that a condomination affirming that he does not seek to justify a will, he estimates that in the Caesarean section. (é) the character proportionality of the condominium », justify their decisions and adapt the peins in the context of context.

The Court of Cassation, which has the right to do so and does not have the fund of affairs, says that in addition to the measure of assistance, it is possible that the action will be limited by the fact that it is inscribed in the frame of a militant and powerful coup. be considered as an expression (in the sense of the European right), the condomination is not disproportionate to the symbolic value of the portrait of the President of the Republic and the refusals of the restitution so that the leursaiques revendication of the circumstance this is a reunion.

La Cour dismantled his insuréhension totale de nos actions

En posant un cadre, ces décisions «constituent quê même une advancée», a estimé Me Paul Mathonnet, un des avocats des «décrocheurs», tout en regrettant que «le point d’equilibre ne soit pas là où nous le souhaitions». “After these three criteria of symbolic value, refusal of restitution and action in reunion is a factor in not recognizing this political expression,” he said.

“C’est une déception, la Cour démontre son insuréhension totale de nos actions, mais nous restons déterminés”, a de son côté dit Cécile Marchand, “décrocheuse” in Paris. “The collective action is essential, the political message is totally associated with the symbol and irreversibility (the non-restitution of portraits) of the message part”, at-elle ajouté.

Source by [author_name]